Abstract: Investigated the relationship anywhere between prosocial and restriction-depending moral reasoning and you may liberal and you can humanistic governmental attitudes



Utiliza nuestro formulario. Resoveremos todas tus dudas


Abstract: Investigated the relationship anywhere between prosocial and restriction-depending moral reasoning and you may liberal and you can humanistic governmental attitudes

Educational ramifications is discussed

Blum, Paul. 1976. «A relative Data of the Perception out of Family unit members and you may Social Part Orientation with the Growth of Spiritual Values one of Adolescents.»Thesis, College or university away from Notre Dame.

Eisenberg Berg, Nancy. 1976. «New Relation regarding Governmental Thinking to Constraint-Centered and you will Prosocial Moral Reason.» Developmental Mindset vol. several, pp. 552-553. 76 White middle-group 7th-12th graders out-of good Presbyterian chapel and you may good Jewish go camping complete a great 41-items political questionnaire and you may a written mission shot regarding ethical reasoning considering L. Kohlberg’s (1969) conceptualizations. Chi-square analyses showed that old Ss had been alot more liberal and you will humanitarian than just more youthful Ss, and you may elderly Ss exhibited a somewhat higher level out of moral reasoning. Correlations ranging from governmental feelings ratings and you may moral indicator partially offered the brand new theory you to definitely high quantities of ethical need is actually associated with the more liberal and you may humanistic thinking: Liberalism ratings had been somewhat linked to the brand new prosocial, limitation, and combined moral indices; humanitarian score was in fact somewhat pertaining to the newest prosocial and you may shared indicator, not the fresh new constraint list. After that scientific studies are needed seriously to see whether conclusions generalize to many other personal strata. [Source: PI]

Maddock, James W. 1976. «Future in place of Records: Youth’s Crisis out of Relationship.» Spiritual Studies vol. 71, pp. 5-16. Abstract: This information signifies that a people described as persistent public alter and you may major pluralism produces young people not having a clear feeling of term and you can (ergo out of) historical perspective, an effective continuity away from meaning over the years. The clear answer, it is debated, will be based upon conversation youth into a sense of ethical connection while the a bridge between personal name and social community. The outcome would be an effective pluralistic neighborhood led by the earliest moral sensibilities, a realistic network out of interpersonal personal debt, a core away from preferred ethical motives, and a provided readiness when deciding to take duty to have framing the long term. [Source: RI]

Miller, Kenneth L. 1976. «The relationship out of Development stages in Child’s Moral and you may Spiritual Considering.» Thesis, Arizona Condition College.

O’Byrne, Simon. 1976. Moral Advancement and Logical Reasoning of Adolescents: An experimental Research study that have Teenage People Comparing Different Process. Dublin: Frederick Force.

Blackner, Gary L

Knox, Ian. 1975. «Faith together with Expectations of Society To your Teenage.» Spiritual Knowledge vol. 70, pp. 649-660. Abstract: Covers ramifications for teenage ethical knowledge of your own pressure anywhere between characteristics and you can social need. Considering E. Erikson’s principle of adolescent identity invention and you will psychoanalytic principle generally speaking, the brand new theologically extremely important need to to get reduce out-of satisfaction is far more conveniently prepared by focus on incontrare persone internazionali the neighborhood and you can institutional proportions of faith. [Source: PI]

Peatling, John H., Charles W. Laabs, and you will Thomas B. Newton. 1975. «Cognitive Innovation: An effective About three-Shot Review of Form towards the Peatling Level from Religious Convinced.» Character Potential: Tabs on Search vol. seven, pp. 159-162. Abstract: Opposed function into the 6 Peatling Scales of Religious Thought to have step three years levels. Youngest Ss was 988 people within the Lutheran Missouri Synod colleges (average degrees level, 6.4). Elderly Ss have been 1,994 pupils for the Episcopal universities (mediocre stages level, 7.9). step 3,289 mature Ss had been inside the Joined Methodist Adult Bible categories. The fresh forecasts meaning for the step 3 Conceptual Phase Bills do improve as we grow old if you are opportinity for the 3 Concrete Bills would fall off as we grow old was confirmed. Overall performance advise that the new Peatling Scales size Piagetian constructs, where they were built, and you may inferentially showcase make authenticity. Efficiency suggest faster growth in religious thinking ranging from young people and you may adolescence than simply ranging from adolescence and you can adulthood. The complexities from creativity throughout the center puberty is highlighted of the usage of 6 bills rather than just the two conclusion balances. Overall performance refuse the assumption one to intellectual invention is performed during the puberty. [Source: PI]


0 comentarios

Enviar un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.